of course, we are talking about three discs. Well, perhaps this is the best tablet bundle we have ever seen. In addition to the device itself, it was found in it:
We’ll get to know the new product better, and then conduct one interesting experiment! So the 110W looks like an absolutely logical and adequate improvement. So, we see that 100W had an Intel Atom Z530 processor (whereas in 110W it had an AMD Z-01) and a worse screen (TN-matrix, resolution 1024 × 600 versus the current 1200 × 800), in addition, the new model became a bit thinner. Let’s compare the characteristics of 110W and 100W, and also compare them with the ASUS Eee Slate and Acer Iconia Tab W500.
WindPad 110W became the “heir” of the WindPad 100W tablet, released in early 2011. WindPad is positioned as a more democratic model, and the price (on average about 17,000 rubles at the time of writing the review) contributes to this. Another thing is that ASUS had in many ways unique functionality that could be claimed by a narrow category of professional designers, architects, artists. Recall that it was the high cost (about 50,000 rubles) that was one of the factors that repelled the ASUS Eee Slate tablet and significantly reduced the number of potential buyers. Today, we will consider the MSI WindPad 110W model, which is nevertheless closer to mainstream tablet standards, and in addition, much more affordable.
